Before you begin
- The preceding limits, differentiation, and integration chapters.
Learning objectives
- Connect a rate model to cumulative change and average values.
- Check a model's extrema, units, feasibility, and parameter sensitivity.
- Complete a cumulative set of computational and proof problems.
A reservoir receives water at modeled rate cubic metres per hour for hours. Water leaves at a constant rate of cubic metres per hour. At time zero the reservoir contains cubic metres. These are hypothetical quantities chosen for an investigation, not observations from a real reservoir. Assume the reservoir can hold the modeled volume without overflowing during the interval.
Recover the stored quantity
The net rate is . Antidifferentiation and the initial condition give
Check by differentiation and by . At six hours, , so net change is cubic metres. The inflow itself accumulates cubic metres, while outflow accumulates . The initial stock, gross inflow, gross outflow, and final stock are distinct quantities whose units agree.
Analyze the whole interval
The rate vanishes at and . It is negative before , positive between and , and negative after . Compare all critical points and endpoints:
Thus the minimum stock is and the maximum cubic metres. Both lie in the interior. The model never empties, and a capacity of at least would avoid overflow under these assumptions. A capacity of would violate the no-overflow model; continuing the same stock formula would no longer describe actual stored volume after overflow begins.
The strongest net inflow occurs at because is maximized there, with value cubic metres per hour. This is not the time of greatest stock. Maximizing a quantity and maximizing its rate are different tasks.
Total variation and average stock
The stock decreases by cubic metres before , increases by between and , then decreases by before . Its total variation is cubic metres, compared with net change . Total variation sums absolute changes and can be written after splitting at the rate’s zeros.
The average stock is
In this particular symmetric example, the endpoint average also equals . That coincidence is not a general rule for cubic stock functions; the integral supplies the justification here.
Investigate a changed outflow
Replace the outflow by a parameter . Then , and its zeros, when , are . For , the net rate is negative throughout the interval. The final stock is . To establish physical feasibility, justify the interval minimum rather than relying on an endpoint check without an interval argument. The model’s physical feasibility is an interval question.
Cumulative problems
- Prove using an explicit epsilon–delta construction.
- A function equals for and at . Is it continuous or differentiable at ?
- Differentiate .
- Use MVT to prove that a differentiable function with zero derivative on an interval is constant there.
- Find the absolute extrema of on .
- Evaluate .
- Differentiate .
- For the reservoir, calculate the stock at and explain why it is neither an absolute maximum nor minimum.
- Find the area between and on .
- Explain why cannot be evaluated by a single endpoint antiderivative difference.
Worked cumulative solutions
- If , then . Choose . Factoring gives .
- Its limit is , unequal to its value . It is discontinuous and therefore not differentiable.
- .
- For any in the interval, MVT gives . Hence all values agree.
- Endpoint and critical values are at respectively. Maximum occurs at ; minimum occurs at .
- Substitute to obtain .
- .
- . The rate there is positive and maximal, so stock is still increasing; the stock maximum occurs later at .
- .
- The integrand is unbounded at zero; the continuous-integrand FTC does not apply and the improper integral diverges.
Independent extension
Choose a new constant outflow and capacity. Determine the earliest time the model would empty or overflow, if either occurs on . Report the stock formula, all candidate crossing intervals, a justified numerical bracket where necessary, a derivative sign chart, and an explicit statement of where your physical model stops applying. Include a computational check, but retain an analytic explanation for each existence or uniqueness claim. This is a mathematical investigation, not an engineering recommendation for an actual water system.