Before you begin
- Chain rule, antiderivatives, and both forms of the fundamental theorem.
Learning objectives
- Derive substitution from the chain rule and FTC.
- Transform an entire definite integral, including its bounds.
- Verify antiderivatives and distinguish substitution from unsupported symbol cancellation.
The integral of contains a composition and the derivative of its inner function. The chain rule says , so reversing it supplies an antiderivative. Substitution organizes that recognition.
The theorem behind the notation
If , then the chain rule gives . Consequently,
Under continuous integrand and continuously differentiable substitution hypotheses on , FTC yields
The substitution need not be one-to-one for this signed one-dimensional identity when these conditions hold: the chain-rule proof handles reversals automatically. More general change-of-variable theorems require their own conditions. The shorthand and records this theorem; it is not permission to replace pieces of an integrand inconsistently.
Matching the differential factor
For , let , giving . Then
Differentiate the result: . This verifies the coefficient, the most common source of a substitution error.
For , use , obtaining on intervals avoiding . The absolute value and domain restriction remain necessary.
Definite bounds belong to the new variable
Evaluate . With , the bounds transform from to , so the result is . For , the transformed bounds are , yielding . The first example happens to preserve the numerical bounds; that coincidence is not a rule.
One may instead find an antiderivative in and then use the original bounds. What fails is evaluating a -antiderivative at bounds that still represent without transformation.
For , let , . Bounds become and , so . The negative sign and reversed bounds are two coordinated consequences of decreasing cosine; dropping both accidentally may conceal an error in a more complex problem.
Useful patterns and honest limits
The pattern integrates to on nonzero intervals. The pattern integrates to . The pattern integrates to . Recognize the derivative factor, including constant multiples, rather than merely spotting a complicated inner expression.
For , choosing introduces on a positive branch and does not produce the simple exponential integral. The missing factor matters. A substitution that makes a formula longer is not progress, and not every elementary integrand has an elementary antiderivative. Definite integration and numerical approximation remain meaningful.
Exercises
- Integrate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Integrate and verify the factor.
- Evaluate ; explain why using is still consistent despite noninjectivity.
- Explain the missing factor in the incorrect assertion .
Worked solutions
- With , the result is .
- .
- transforms the bounds to , giving .
- ; the chain-rule factor cancels on differentiation.
- The integral is zero by . The substitution identity gives and accounts for the orientation reversal during the path.
- Differentiating the proposed answer gives , which is a different integrand.